Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 74.7 |
| Input Price | $0.07/M | $2.00/M |
| Output Price | $0.26/M | $12.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 65,536 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 76.7 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 35.3 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 100.0 |
| eqbench | - | 64.7 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.13 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $5.00, so Qwen3.5-Flash is about 38.5 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers audio input.
Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on 3 (Code Completion, Bulk Data Labeling, Short-Form Summarization), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).
Pick Qwen3.5-Flash if you need lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you need audio input or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 168 |
| Code Review | 132 | 168 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 120 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 168 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 177 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 154 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 144 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 133 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 145 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 145 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 164 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 155 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 156 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 137 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 123 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 147 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 147 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 163 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 121 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 140 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →