head-to-head

PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorprism-mlthinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Input Price$0.07/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.50/M$4.05/M
Context Window262,144524,288
Max Output32,768471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.20 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is about 10.1 times cheaper for the same work.

Inkling reads up to 524,288 tokens at once, roughly 786 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B.

Only Ternary Bonsai 2 27B offers structured output; only Inkling offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B scores higher on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Unit Test Generation and others), Inkling on 7 (Code Review, Code Refactoring, Bug Fixing and others).

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B was released in September 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B if you need lower cost or structured output; pick Inkling if you need long documents or audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskPrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27BThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 131 125
Code Review 126 128
Code Completion 129 119
Code Refactoring 127 132
Bug Fixing 130 136
Unit Test Generation 121 116
Code Documentation 126 131
Regex Writing 119 119
CI/CD Pipelines 117 116
Frontend Component Design 122 118
Data Analysis 124 120
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 128 121
ETL Scripting 122 124
JSON Extraction 131 111
Bulk Data Labeling 129 116
OCR / Document Parsing 128 123
Table Extraction from PDFs 128 123
Long-Document Summarization 129 137
Short-Form Summarization 123 115
Blog Post Writing 119 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs PrismML: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.