OpenAI: GPT Terra Latest vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| OpenAI: GPT Terra Latest | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~openai | deepseek |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $1.00/M | $0.05/M |
| Output Price | $5.00/M | $0.57/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 943,718 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.19 and GPT Terra Latest costs $2.25, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is about 11.7 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,573 pages.
Across the 10 tasks where they differ, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others).
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | OpenAI: GPT Terra Latest | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 133 |
| Code Completion | 118 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 130 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 118 | 119 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 133 |
| JSON Extraction | 122 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 120 | 129 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 137 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 114 | 123 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 121 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →