OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-30.
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | openai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 89.2 | 81.2 |
| Input Price | $2.00/M | $2.00/M |
| Output Price | $10.00/M | $10.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,050,000 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 85.5 | 78.4 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, both cost $4.50 at current list prices.
Both read up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text.
On our blended benchmark score GPT-6.1 Sol leads 89.2 to 81.2.
Across the 18 tasks where they differ, GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 143 | 142 |
| Code Review | 148 | 146 |
| Code Completion | 119 | 119 |
| Code Refactoring | 149 | 148 |
| Bug Fixing | 152 | 150 |
| Unit Test Generation | 134 | 133 |
| Code Documentation | 137 | 136 |
| Regex Writing | 126 | 125 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 130 | 129 |
| Frontend Component Design | 132 | 131 |
| Data Analysis | 136 | 135 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 136 | 135 |
| ETL Scripting | 140 | 139 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 135 | 134 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 135 | 134 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 150 | 149 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 117 | 117 |
| Blog Post Writing | 131 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →