head-to-head

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Vendoropenaigoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-84.2
Input Price$1.00/M$0.75/M
Output Price$6.00/M$4.50/M
Context Window1,050,0001,048,576
Max Output128,00065,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-82.8
ai_index_agentic-61.8
ai_index_coding-100.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) costs $1.88 and GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) costs $2.50, so Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) is about 1.3 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) was released in July 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) in May 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost, audio input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 133 169
Code Review 132 164
Code Completion 118 132
Code Refactoring 136 162
Bug Fixing 136 176
Unit Test Generation 124 152
Code Documentation 130 142
Regex Writing 118 134
CI/CD Pipelines 120 143
Frontend Component Design 122 145
Data Analysis 124 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 153
ETL Scripting 128 152
JSON Extraction 122 147
Bulk Data Labeling 119 134
OCR / Document Parsing 131 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 146
Long-Document Summarization 137 158
Short-Form Summarization 114 130
Blog Post Writing 121 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.