OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-09.
| OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | openai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 62.3 |
| Input Price | $0.20/M | $0.20/M |
| Output Price | $1.20/M | $1.20/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,050,000 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 61.6 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, both cost $0.50 at current list prices.
Both read up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text.
Across the 18 tasks where they differ, GPT-5.6 Luna on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna if you need the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 141 |
| Code Review | 132 | 143 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 133 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 145 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 147 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 137 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 125 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 127 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 129 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 133 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 136 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 136 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 134 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 134 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 147 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 126 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 129 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →