head-to-head

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Vendoropenaianthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-91.4
Input Price$0.20/M$1.00/M
Output Price$1.20/M$5.00/M
Context Window1,050,0001,000,000
Max Output128,000128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-88.0
ai_index_agentic-77.0
ai_index_coding-100.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro costs $0.50 and Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) costs $2.25, so GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is about 4.5 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,500 pages.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro scores higher on 3 (Code Completion, Bulk Data Labeling, Short-Form Summarization), Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro was released in July 2026 and Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) in June 2026.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna Pro if you need lower cost; pick Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) if you need the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna ProAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 133 171
Code Review 132 167
Code Completion 131 120
Code Refactoring 136 164
Bug Fixing 136 180
Unit Test Generation 124 154
Code Documentation 131 143
Regex Writing 119 136
CI/CD Pipelines 120 144
Frontend Component Design 122 146
Data Analysis 124 171
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 154
ETL Scripting 128 154
JSON Extraction 131 140
Bulk Data Labeling 129 126
OCR / Document Parsing 131 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 146
Long-Document Summarization 137 160
Short-Form Summarization 123 123
Blog Post Writing 121 140

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.