head-to-head

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-19.

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)
Vendormetaopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score81.7-
Input Price$1.25/M$0.10/M
Output Price$4.25/M$0.60/M
Context Window1,048,5761,050,000
Max Output943,718128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index79.4-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) costs $0.25 and Muse Spark 1.3 costs $2.31, so GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is about 9.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,575 pages.

Only Muse Spark 1.3 offers video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Muse Spark 1.3 was released in September 2026 and GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) in July 2026.

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 if you need video input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskMeta: Muse Spark 1.3OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)
SQL Generation 143 133
Code Review 147 132
Code Completion 120 131
Code Refactoring 148 136
Bug Fixing 151 136
Unit Test Generation 133 124
Code Documentation 138 131
Regex Writing 126 119
CI/CD Pipelines 129 120
Frontend Component Design 131 122
Data Analysis 135 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 133
ETL Scripting 139 128
JSON Extraction 122 131
Bulk Data Labeling 120 129
OCR / Document Parsing 135 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 131
Long-Document Summarization 150 137
Short-Form Summarization 118 123
Blog Post Writing 131 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.