Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 | Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | meta | ~anthropic |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $1.25/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $4.25/M | $0.50/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 943,718 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Claude Haiku Latest costs $0.23 and Muse Spark 1.1 costs $2.31, so Claude Haiku Latest is about 10.3 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.
Only Muse Spark 1.1 offers video input.
Across the 10 tasks where they differ, Claude Haiku Latest on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others).
Muse Spark 1.1 was released in July 2026 and Claude Haiku Latest in April 2026.
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you need video input; pick Claude Haiku Latest if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 | Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 133 |
| Code Completion | 118 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 130 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 118 | 119 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 133 |
| JSON Extraction | 122 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 120 | 129 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 137 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 114 | 123 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 121 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →