Meta: Muse Ember vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-12.
| Meta: Muse Ember | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | meta | anthropic |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 56.7 | 57.5 |
| Input Price | $0.10/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.50/M | $0.50/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 943,718 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 59.4 | 60.2 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, both cost $0.23 at current list prices.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.
Only Muse Ember offers audio input and video input.
Across the 14 tasks where they differ, Claude Haiku 5.5 on 14 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).
Muse Ember was released in November 2026 and Claude Haiku 5.5 in October 2026.
Pick Muse Ember if you need audio input or video input; pick Claude Haiku 5.5 if you need the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Meta: Muse Ember | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 141 | 141 |
| Code Review | 143 | 143 |
| Code Refactoring | 145 | 145 |
| Bug Fixing | 147 | 147 |
| Unit Test Generation | 131 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 137 | 137 |
| Regex Writing | 125 | 125 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 127 | 127 |
| Frontend Component Design | 129 | 129 |
| Data Analysis | 132 | 133 |
| ETL Scripting | 136 | 136 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 147 | 147 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 126 | 126 |
| Blog Post Writing | 129 | 129 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →