picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-22.

Google: Gemma 4 31B Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score56.454.1
Input Price$0.12/M$0.26/M
Output Price$0.35/M$2.08/M
Context Window262,144262,144
Max Output262,144262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index48.453.3
ai_index_agentic23.834.2
ai_index_coding71.775.4
eqbench70.8-

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemma 4 31BQwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SQL Generation 157 155
Code Review 154 148
Code Completion 132 129
Code Refactoring 152 145
Bug Fixing 161 156
Unit Test Generation 143 140
Code Documentation 138 133
Regex Writing 131 129
CI/CD Pipelines 136 132
Frontend Component Design 138 137
Data Analysis 152 152
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 146 142
ETL Scripting 144 139
JSON Extraction 143 143
Bulk Data Labeling 133 133
OCR / Document Parsing 140 139
Table Extraction from PDFs 140 139
Long-Document Summarization 150 143
Short-Form Summarization 129 128
Blog Post Writing 134 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemma 4 31B MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemma 4 31B Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B