head-to-head
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-18.
| Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 53.4 | 70.5 |
| Input Price | $0.06/M | $0.20/M |
| Output Price | $0.33/M | $1.25/M |
| Context Window | 262,144 | 400,000 |
| Max Output | - | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 42.4 | 63.1 |
| ai_index_agentic | 53.0 | 78.5 |
| ai_index_coding | 37.0 | 72.4 |
| eqbench | 70.0 | - |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 154 | 164 |
| Code Review | 152 | 159 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 133 |
| Code Refactoring | 150 | 158 |
| Bug Fixing | 162 | 173 |
| Unit Test Generation | 140 | 148 |
| Code Documentation | 138 | 141 |
| Regex Writing | 131 | 133 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 134 | 139 |
| Frontend Component Design | 136 | 141 |
| Data Analysis | 152 | 163 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 141 | 149 |
| ETL Scripting | 142 | 148 |
| JSON Extraction | 139 | 144 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 132 | 134 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 137 | 143 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 137 | 143 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 150 | 155 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 129 | 130 |
| Blog Post Writing | 133 | 137 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano