head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-28.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorgooglethinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score65.539.4
Input Price$0.75/M$1.00/M
Output Price$3.75/M$4.05/M
Context Window1,048,576524,288
Max Output65,536471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index64.441.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $1.69 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Gemini 3.7 Flash is slightly cheaper for the same work.

Gemini 3.7 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 786 pages for Inkling.

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash offers structured output and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 65.5 to 39.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released in August 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash if you need lower cost, long documents, structured output, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 FlashThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 141 130
Code Review 144 135
Code Completion 132 119
Code Refactoring 146 138
Bug Fixing 148 143
Unit Test Generation 131 120
Code Documentation 136 134
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 127 120
Frontend Component Design 129 122
Data Analysis 133 126
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 123
ETL Scripting 137 129
JSON Extraction 131 111
Bulk Data Labeling 128 116
OCR / Document Parsing 134 125
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 125
Long-Document Summarization 147 144
Short-Form Summarization 126 117
Blog Post Writing 129 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.