head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-12.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorgooglethinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-15.3
Input Price$0.75/M$1.00/M
Output Price$3.75/M$4.05/M
Context Window1,048,576524,288
Max Output65,536471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-20.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $1.69 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Gemini 3.7 Flash is slightly cheaper for the same work.

Gemini 3.7 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 786 pages for Inkling.

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash offers structured output and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on 15 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Inkling on 5 (Bug Fixing, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others).

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released in August 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash if you need lower cost, long documents, structured output, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 FlashThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 133 128
Code Review 132 131
Code Completion 131 119
Code Refactoring 136 135
Bug Fixing 136 139
Unit Test Generation 124 118
Code Documentation 131 132
Regex Writing 119 121
CI/CD Pipelines 120 118
Frontend Component Design 122 120
Data Analysis 124 123
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 122
ETL Scripting 128 126
JSON Extraction 131 111
Bulk Data Labeling 128 116
OCR / Document Parsing 131 124
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 124
Long-Document Summarization 137 140
Short-Form Summarization 123 116
Blog Post Writing 121 124

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.