head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-28.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
Vendorgoogleopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score65.571.1
Input Price$0.75/M$1.00/M
Output Price$3.75/M$6.00/M
Context Window1,048,5761,050,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index64.469.4

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $1.69 and GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) costs $2.50, so Gemini 3.7 Flash is about 1.5 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,575 pages.

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) leads 71.1 to 65.5.

Across the 18 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on 5 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, JSON Extraction and others), GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released in August 2026 and GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) in July 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash if you need lower cost, audio input or video input; pick GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 FlashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
SQL Generation 141 141
Code Review 144 145
Code Completion 132 120
Code Refactoring 146 147
Bug Fixing 148 149
Unit Test Generation 131 132
Code Documentation 136 136
CI/CD Pipelines 127 128
Frontend Component Design 129 130
Data Analysis 133 134
ETL Scripting 137 137
JSON Extraction 131 122
Bulk Data Labeling 128 119
OCR / Document Parsing 134 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 134
Long-Document Summarization 147 148
Short-Form Summarization 126 118
Blog Post Writing 129 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.