head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-28.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score65.534.2
Input Price$0.75/M$0.30/M
Output Price$3.75/M$2.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index64.436.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.93 and Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $1.69, so Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is about 1.8 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 65.5 to 34.2.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling).

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released in August 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in July 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SQL Generation 141 138
Code Review 144 139
Code Completion 132 132
Code Refactoring 146 141
Bug Fixing 148 143
Unit Test Generation 131 128
Code Documentation 136 134
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 127 124
Frontend Component Design 129 126
Data Analysis 133 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 135
ETL Scripting 137 133
JSON Extraction 131 131
Bulk Data Labeling 128 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 132
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 132
Long-Document Summarization 147 143
Short-Form Summarization 126 125
Blog Post Writing 129 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.