head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-28.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
Vendorgoogleopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score65.562.3
Input Price$0.38/M$0.10/M
Output Price$1.88/M$0.60/M
Context Window1,048,5761,050,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index64.461.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) costs $0.25 and Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) costs $0.84, so GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) is about 3.4 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,575 pages.

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) leads 65.5 to 62.3.

Across the 18 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) scores higher on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) on 5 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, JSON Extraction and others).

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) was released in August 2026 and GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) in July 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) if you need audio input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
SQL Generation 141 141
Code Review 144 143
Code Completion 132 133
Code Refactoring 146 145
Bug Fixing 148 147
Unit Test Generation 131 131
Code Documentation 137 137
CI/CD Pipelines 127 127
Frontend Component Design 129 129
Data Analysis 133 133
ETL Scripting 137 136
JSON Extraction 131 131
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 134
Long-Document Summarization 148 147
Short-Form Summarization 126 126
Blog Post Writing 129 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.