picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-14.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.762.3
Input Price$0.19/M$0.30/M
Output Price$0.94/M$2.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.461.8
ai_index_agentic74.444.8
ai_index_coding100.081.4

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SQL Generation 172 161
Code Review 168 157
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 165 156
Bug Fixing 181 166
Unit Test Generation 155 146
Code Documentation 144 140
Regex Writing 137 131
CI/CD Pipelines 145 137
Frontend Component Design 147 139
Data Analysis 171 157
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 149
ETL Scripting 155 147
JSON Extraction 149 145
Bulk Data Labeling 135 133
OCR / Document Parsing 147 143
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 143
Long-Document Summarization 161 153
Short-Form Summarization 132 129
Blog Post Writing 141 135

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max