head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | x-ai | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 34.2 | 65.0 |
| Input Price | $0.30/M | $2.00/M |
| Output Price | $2.50/M | $6.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 500,000 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 450,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 36.6 | 64.0 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 138 | 140 |
| Code Review | 139 | 144 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 119 |
| Code Refactoring | 141 | 146 |
| Bug Fixing | 143 | 148 |
| Unit Test Generation | 128 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 134 | 136 |
| Regex Writing | 123 | 124 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 124 | 127 |
| Frontend Component Design | 126 | 129 |
| Data Analysis | 129 | 133 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 135 | 135 |
| ETL Scripting | 133 | 137 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 122 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 119 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 132 | 134 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 132 | 134 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 143 | 147 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 125 | 117 |
| Blog Post Writing | 126 | 128 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite