picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-08.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)
Vendorgoogleopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score62.3-
Input Price$0.30/M$0.10/M
Output Price$2.50/M$0.60/M
Context Window1,048,5761,050,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index61.8-
ai_index_agentic44.8-
ai_index_coding81.4-

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)
SQL Generation 161 133
Code Review 157 132
Code Completion 132 131
Code Refactoring 156 136
Bug Fixing 166 136
Unit Test Generation 146 124
Code Documentation 140 131
Regex Writing 131 119
CI/CD Pipelines 137 120
Frontend Component Design 139 122
Data Analysis 157 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 149 133
ETL Scripting 147 128
JSON Extraction 145 131
Bulk Data Labeling 133 129
OCR / Document Parsing 143 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 143 131
Long-Document Summarization 153 137
Short-Form Summarization 129 123
Blog Post Writing 135 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)