head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-29.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Vendorgoogleanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score62.490.4
Input Price$0.15/M$1.00/M
Output Price$1.25/M$5.00/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling
Structured Output
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index60.288.0
ai_index_agentic44.377.0
ai_index_coding81.4100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 161 171
Code Review 156 167
Code Completion 132 120
Code Refactoring 156 164
Bug Fixing 166 180
Unit Test Generation 146 154
Code Documentation 140 143
Regex Writing 131 136
CI/CD Pipelines 137 144
Frontend Component Design 139 146
Data Analysis 156 171
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 149 154
ETL Scripting 146 154
JSON Extraction 145 140
Bulk Data Labeling 134 126
OCR / Document Parsing 143 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 143 146
Long-Document Summarization 153 160
Short-Form Summarization 129 123
Blog Post Writing 135 140

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)