head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-09.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Vendordeepseekgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score80.147.6
Input Price$0.11/M$0.15/M
Output Price$0.33/M$1.25/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output943,71865,536
Tool Calling
Structured Output
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.837.4
ai_index_agentic79.426.3
ai_index_coding100.081.4

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
SQL Generation 169 155
Code Review 161 150
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 159 151
Bug Fixing 175 158
Unit Test Generation 151 142
Code Documentation 141 137
Regex Writing 134 128
CI/CD Pipelines 141 133
Frontend Component Design 143 135
Data Analysis 167 149
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 148
ETL Scripting 150 142
JSON Extraction 149 144
Bulk Data Labeling 135 133
OCR / Document Parsing 145 141
Table Extraction from PDFs 145 141
Long-Document Summarization 156 148
Short-Form Summarization 131 128
Blog Post Writing 137 131

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)