Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT Sol Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-29.
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | OpenAI: GPT Sol Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | anthropic | ~openai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 97.0 | - |
| Input Price | $2.00/M | $2.00/M |
| Output Price | $10.00/M | $10.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,050,000 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 92.4 | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, both cost $4.50 at current list prices.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,575 pages.
Across the 18 tasks where they differ, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 if you need the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 | OpenAI: GPT Sol Latest |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 143 | 132 |
| Code Review | 149 | 132 |
| Code Completion | 119 | 117 |
| Code Refactoring | 150 | 136 |
| Bug Fixing | 153 | 136 |
| Unit Test Generation | 135 | 124 |
| Code Documentation | 137 | 129 |
| Regex Writing | 126 | 117 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 131 | 120 |
| Frontend Component Design | 133 | 122 |
| Data Analysis | 137 | 124 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 136 | 132 |
| ETL Scripting | 140 | 128 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 135 | 131 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 135 | 131 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 151 | 136 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 118 | 113 |
| Blog Post Writing | 131 | 120 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →