picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-30.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score83.352.3
Input Price$0.75/M$0.14/M
Output Price$4.50/M$1.00/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,536262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.852.2
ai_index_agentic61.835.3
ai_index_coding100.069.1

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SQL Generation 169 154
Code Review 164 147
Code Completion 132 130
Code Refactoring 162 144
Bug Fixing 176 156
Unit Test Generation 152 140
Code Documentation 142 133
Regex Writing 134 129
CI/CD Pipelines 143 132
Frontend Component Design 145 137
Data Analysis 167 151
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 141
ETL Scripting 152 138
JSON Extraction 147 143
Bulk Data Labeling 134 133
OCR / Document Parsing 146 138
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 138
Long-Document Summarization 158 142
Short-Form Summarization 130 128
Blog Post Writing 139 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B