picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-29.

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score83.983.3
Input Price$0.75/M$0.75/M
Output Price$3.75/M$4.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.682.8
ai_index_agentic63.961.8
ai_index_coding100.0100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 169 169
Code Review 165 164
Code Completion 132 132
Code Refactoring 162 162
Bug Fixing 177 176
Unit Test Generation 153 152
Code Documentation 142 142
Regex Writing 135 134
CI/CD Pipelines 143 143
Frontend Component Design 145 145
Data Analysis 167 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 153
ETL Scripting 153 152
JSON Extraction 148 147
Bulk Data Labeling 134 134
Long-Document Summarization 158 158
Short-Form Summarization 131 130
Blog Post Writing 139 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1