head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-09.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch)
Vendordeepseekthinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score80.156.9
Input Price$0.11/M$0.50/M
Output Price$0.33/M$1.20/M
Context Window1,048,576524,288
Max Output943,718471,859
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.843.0
ai_index_agentic79.441.2
ai_index_coding100.087.4

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch)Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch)
SQL Generation 169 151
Code Review 161 149
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 159 149
Bug Fixing 175 163
Unit Test Generation 151 136
Code Documentation 141 138
Regex Writing 134 129
CI/CD Pipelines 141 131
Frontend Component Design 143 133
Data Analysis 167 150
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 137
ETL Scripting 150 140
JSON Extraction 149 134
Bulk Data Labeling 135 130
OCR / Document Parsing 145 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 145 134
Long-Document Summarization 156 150
Short-Form Summarization 131 128
Blog Post Writing 137 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch)