head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-09.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Vendordeepseekmeta
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score80.168.8
Input Price$0.11/M$1.25/M
Output Price$0.33/M$4.25/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output943,718943,718
Tool Calling
Structured Output
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.856.5
ai_index_agentic79.445.4
ai_index_coding100.0100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch)Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
SQL Generation 169 163
Code Review 161 158
Code Completion 133 120
Code Refactoring 159 157
Bug Fixing 175 168
Unit Test Generation 151 148
Code Documentation 141 139
Regex Writing 134 131
CI/CD Pipelines 141 139
Frontend Component Design 143 141
Data Analysis 167 159
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 152
ETL Scripting 150 148
JSON Extraction 149 139
Bulk Data Labeling 135 125
OCR / Document Parsing 145 144
Table Extraction from PDFs 145 144
Long-Document Summarization 156 153
Short-Form Summarization 131 121
Blog Post Writing 137 135

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1