picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-30.

Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Vendorthinkingmachinesgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score69.783.3
Input Price$1.00/M$0.75/M
Output Price$4.05/M$4.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output-65,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output-✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index67.282.8
ai_index_agentic53.461.8
ai_index_coding85.9100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: InklingGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 155 169
Code Review 155 164
Code Completion 120 132
Code Refactoring 154 162
Bug Fixing 170 176
Unit Test Generation 140 152
Code Documentation 140 142
Regex Writing 132 134
CI/CD Pipelines 135 143
Frontend Component Design 137 145
Data Analysis 156 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 138 153
ETL Scripting 144 152
JSON Extraction 125 147
Bulk Data Labeling 121 134
OCR / Document Parsing 136 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 136 146
Long-Document Summarization 154 158
Short-Form Summarization 121 130
Blog Post Writing 136 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)