head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-08.

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vendorthinkingmachinesgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score70.584.3
Input Price$0.50/M$1.50/M
Output Price$2.02/M$9.00/M
Context Window524,2881,048,576
Max Output-65,536
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio
Benchmark Scores
ai_index69.885.7
ai_index_agentic56.365.5
ai_index_coding85.9100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
SQL Generation 156 169
Code Review 156 165
Code Completion 132 119
Code Refactoring 154 163
Bug Fixing 171 178
Unit Test Generation 140 153
Code Documentation 141 141
Regex Writing 133 134
CI/CD Pipelines 136 143
Frontend Component Design 138 145
Data Analysis 157 168
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 139 153
ETL Scripting 145 153
JSON Extraction 134 138
Bulk Data Labeling 130 124
OCR / Document Parsing 136 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 136 146
Long-Document Summarization 155 158
Short-Form Summarization 130 122
Blog Post Writing 136 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash