Space Bunny Alpha vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-24.
| Space Bunny Alpha | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | stealth | qwen |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | Free | $0.15/M |
| Output Price | Free | $0.47/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 524,288 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Space Bunny Alpha costs $0 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.27, so Space Bunny Alpha is free for the same work.
Both read up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text.
Only Qwen3.8 Omni Flash offers audio input.
Across the 10 tasks where they differ, Space Bunny Alpha scores higher on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others).
Pick Space Bunny Alpha if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if you need audio input.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Space Bunny Alpha | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 133 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 132 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 120 | 119 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 133 |
| JSON Extraction | 132 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 130 | 129 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 137 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 124 | 123 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 121 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →