OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch)
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-02.
| OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | anthropic |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.50/M | $0.05/M |
| Output Price | $2.50/M | $0.25/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) costs $0.11 and GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) costs $1.12, so Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is about 10.0 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,500 pages.
Across the 10 tasks where they differ, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others).
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch) | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 134 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 119 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 134 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 129 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 138 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 123 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 122 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →