picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-30.

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Vendorminimaxgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score77.283.3
Input Price$0.15/M$0.75/M
Output Price$0.60/M$4.50/M
Context Window524,2881,048,576
Max Output-65,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index73.382.8
ai_index_agentic58.361.8
ai_index_coding96.6100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskMiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 167 169
Code Review 162 164
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 160 162
Bug Fixing 173 176
Unit Test Generation 151 152
Code Documentation 142 142
Regex Writing 134 134
CI/CD Pipelines 141 143
Frontend Component Design 143 145
Data Analysis 164 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 153
ETL Scripting 151 152
JSON Extraction 148 147
Bulk Data Labeling 135 134
OCR / Document Parsing 145 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 145 146
Long-Document Summarization 157 158
Short-Form Summarization 131 130
Blog Post Writing 138 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)