MiniMax: MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-23.
| MiniMax: MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | minimax | xiaomi |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 71.3 | 78.2 |
| Input Price | $0.15/M | $0.43/M |
| Output Price | $0.60/M | $0.87/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,050,000 |
| Max Output | 524,288 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 70.5 | 76.4 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.30 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.65, so MiniMax M3.1 Flash is about 2.2 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,575 pages.
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers audio input.
On our blended benchmark score MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 78.2 to 71.3.
Across the 19 tasks where they differ, MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling), MiMo-V2.6-Pro on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).
MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released in October 2026 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in September 2026.
Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash if you need lower cost; pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro if you need audio input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | MiniMax: MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 142 | 143 |
| Code Review | 145 | 146 |
| Code Refactoring | 147 | 148 |
| Bug Fixing | 149 | 150 |
| Unit Test Generation | 132 | 133 |
| Code Documentation | 138 | 138 |
| Regex Writing | 126 | 127 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 128 | 129 |
| Frontend Component Design | 130 | 131 |
| Data Analysis | 134 | 135 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 136 | 136 |
| ETL Scripting | 137 | 138 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 129 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 134 | 134 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 134 | 134 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 149 | 150 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 127 | 127 |
| Blog Post Writing | 130 | 131 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →