head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 69.0 | 55.6 |
| Input Price | $0.75/M | Free |
| Output Price | $3.75/M | Free |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 235,929 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 67.5 | 55.6 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free) |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 141 | 137 |
| Code Review | 144 | 137 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 130 |
| Code Refactoring | 146 | 136 |
| Bug Fixing | 148 | 141 |
| Unit Test Generation | 132 | 127 |
| Code Documentation | 137 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 125 | 125 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 128 | 123 |
| Frontend Component Design | 130 | 128 |
| Data Analysis | 134 | 132 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 136 | 130 |
| ETL Scripting | 137 | 130 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 132 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 128 | 130 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 134 | 131 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 134 | 131 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 148 | 138 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 126 | 126 |
| Blog Post Writing | 129 | 125 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
Cohere: Command A+ vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)