picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.497.2
Input Price$0.38/M$2.00/M
Output Price$1.88/M$6.00/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,536131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index96.895.8
ai_index_agentic82.596.4
ai_index_coding100.0100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
SQL Generation 173 175
Code Review 169 170
Code Completion 133 120
Code Refactoring 166 167
Bug Fixing 183 186
Unit Test Generation 156 157
Code Documentation 144 143
Regex Writing 138 137
CI/CD Pipelines 146 147
Frontend Component Design 148 149
Data Analysis 173 176
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 154
ETL Scripting 156 157
JSON Extraction 149 140
Bulk Data Labeling 135 125
OCR / Document Parsing 147 147
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 147
Long-Document Summarization 162 162
Short-Form Summarization 132 124
Blog Post Writing 142 142

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash