head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-30.

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-52.3
Input Price$0.12/M$0.14/M
Output Price$0.75/M$1.00/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,536262,144
Tool Calling
Structured Output
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-52.2
ai_index_agentic-35.3
ai_index_coding-69.1

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SQL Generation 133 154
Code Review 132 147
Code Completion 131 130
Code Refactoring 136 144
Bug Fixing 136 156
Unit Test Generation 124 140
Code Documentation 131 133
Regex Writing 119 129
CI/CD Pipelines 120 132
Frontend Component Design 122 137
Data Analysis 124 151
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 141
ETL Scripting 128 138
JSON Extraction 131 143
Bulk Data Labeling 129 133
OCR / Document Parsing 131 138
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 138
Long-Document Summarization 137 142
Short-Form Summarization 123 128
Blog Post Writing 121 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B