head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-08.

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Vendorthinkingmachinesgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score70.5-
Input Price$0.50/M$0.12/M
Output Price$2.02/M$0.75/M
Context Window524,2881,048,576
Max Output-65,536
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio
Benchmark Scores
ai_index69.8-
ai_index_agentic56.3-
ai_index_coding85.9-

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
SQL Generation 156 133
Code Review 156 132
Code Completion 132 131
Code Refactoring 154 136
Bug Fixing 171 136
Unit Test Generation 140 124
Code Documentation 141 131
Regex Writing 133 119
CI/CD Pipelines 136 120
Frontend Component Design 138 122
Data Analysis 157 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 139 133
ETL Scripting 145 128
JSON Extraction 134 131
Bulk Data Labeling 130 129
OCR / Document Parsing 136 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 136 131
Long-Document Summarization 155 137
Short-Form Summarization 130 123
Blog Post Writing 136 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)