head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-08.

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)
Vendorgooglethinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score84.470.5
Input Price$0.75/M$0.50/M
Output Price$3.75/M$2.02/M
Context Window1,048,576524,288
Max Output65,536-
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio
Benchmark Scores
ai_index85.169.8
ai_index_agentic66.856.3
ai_index_coding100.085.9

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)
SQL Generation 170 156
Code Review 165 156
Code Completion 132 132
Code Refactoring 163 154
Bug Fixing 178 171
Unit Test Generation 153 140
Code Documentation 142 141
Regex Writing 135 133
CI/CD Pipelines 143 136
Frontend Component Design 145 138
Data Analysis 168 157
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 139
ETL Scripting 153 145
JSON Extraction 148 134
Bulk Data Labeling 134 130
OCR / Document Parsing 146 136
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 136
Long-Document Summarization 159 155
Short-Form Summarization 131 130
Blog Post Writing 139 136

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)